Conservatives are declaring the Boy Scouts dead after it announces it will drop ‘boy’ from its name – ThinkProgress

[ad_1]

The emasculation of the Boy Scouts is complete, at least according to former governor of Arkansas and noted terrible tweeter Mike Huckabee.

On Wednesday, the Boy Scouts announced they will drop the word “boy” from their name, becoming Scouts BSA, as they prepare to welcome girls to the organization starting next year. The organization has also been facing low membership numbers and bad press, two other factors that may have affected the decision to change the name.

But the move isn’t going over well with Huckabee and other conservatives.

“The emasculation of the Boy Scouts is complete,” Huckabee tweeted Thursday morning. “Old Scout oath ‘Be Prepared.’ New oath ‘Be Pretty.'”

The emasculation of the Boy Scouts is complete. Old Scout oath “Be Prepared.” New oath “Be Pretty” https://t.co/YOSl2tl5vx

— Gov. Mike Huckabee (@GovMikeHuckabee) May 3, 2018

Huckabee also shared a video of an earlier appearance on Fox News in which he derided the name change.

“I think the Boy Scouts are effectively dead,” Huckabee said. “Look, I don’t think a lot of people care whether girls have the opportunity to do some of the same thing boys do, but there’s always been a reason that these activities were conducted separately by the genders.”

"I think the Boy Scouts are effectively dead." —@GovMikeHuckabee on the @boyscouts dropping the word "Boy" from their name https://t.co/8NwZ8u2pQX #TheStory pic.twitter.com/vmZdmxRM3N

— Fox News (@FoxNews) May 3, 2018

Boys and girls being separated for scouting activities, according to Huckabee, is important for developing an identity and giving young people “something to grow into.”

“I know this will come as a real shock to a lot of modern people, but there really is a difference between boys and girls and the way they think and grow up,” he said.

To her credit, the Fox News host pushed back, saying that she doesn’t have any problem with the name change and that the change is may actually be most harmful to the Girl Scouts, who feel that the change may harm their organization.

The host also noted that in Scouts BSA, boys and girls will eventually be separated by gender again as they get older, something Huckabee also pushed back against.

“When you say they’re going to back to gender separation when they’re older, that seems to me the most logical time when there wouldn’t be gender separation,” he said.

The host pointed out that perhaps camping together is the reason the scouts want to separate boys and girls at high school age, at which point Huckabee chuckled before going back to his “the Boy Scouts are dead” point.

“I don’t think it’s going to cause the membership to go up,” he said. “I don’t think this is going to cause a lot of parents to say, ‘Gee, that’s just what I was hoping for.'”

Conservative blogger Matt Walsh lodged similar complaints on Fox & Friends Thursday morning.

.@MattWalshBlog: The Boy Scouts were an iconic organization that have destroyed themselves bending to the whims of the PC mob. This is a truth that upsets people these days, but boys are different than girls. pic.twitter.com/9g5fhc8S1k

— FOX & friends (@foxandfriends) May 3, 2018

“This is a curriculum for boys, and boys are different than girls,” he said. “This is a truth that upsets people these days, because any obvious truth does. Boys are different than girls.”

If people are concerned about the moral formation of boys and “making boys into men,” Walsh said, “then you need to separate them from girls.”

The name change, although a very small change, is, according to Walsh, a very big deal and it should be very upsetting to see an “iconic” organization destroying itself by “bending to the whims of the PC leftist mob.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Trump Assails Justice Dept., Siding With House Conservatives in Dispute

[ad_1]

But those efforts have not quieted two of Mr. Trump’s most loyal supporters on Capitol Hill, Representatives Mark Meadows of North Carolina and Jim Jordan of Ohio. In an unusual show of defiance of their committee chairman, they have insisted the agreement is not good enough and that they need access to an unredacted version of an August 2017 memo outlining the scope of Mr. Mueller’s investigation.

Democrats fear that the requests — many of which call on the department to ignore longstanding policy about what it shares with Congress — are merely meant to provide Mr. Trump with a reason to fire Mr. Mueller.

Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said the latest Republican efforts were “clearly trying to sabotage” the Mueller investigation and court a confrontation with Mr. Rosenstein.

“All of this noise is aimed at undermining the special counsel’s work as the investigation closes in on the president,” Mr. Nadler said in a statement. “The president’s attacks on the Department of Justice grow more paranoid by the day. The case for obstruction of justice — and the complicity of these House Republicans — grows day by day as well.”

Mr. Rosenstein has made clear he does not intend to go further.

The Justice Department wrote to Mr. Meadows and Mr. Jordan on Monday to deny them access to the document about the scope of the Russia inquiry, citing department policy against sharing information on a continuing investigation.

And on Tuesday, reacting to reports that Mr. Meadows had drafted articles of impeachment to use against him if needed, Mr. Rosenstein declared that the Justice Department would not be extorted.

“There have been people who have been making threats, privately and publicly, against me for quite some time,” he said at an event in Washington. “And I think they should understand by now, the Department of Justice is not going to be extorted.”

Mr. Meadows fired back, saying that Mr. Rosenstein was stonewalling legitimate oversight requests and calling on him to resign.

Continue reading the main story

Last month, Mr. Trump said Mr. Rosenstein faced conflicts of interest and criticized him for signing a search warrant application to permit federal agents to eavesdrop on one of the president’s former campaign aides. Mr. Rosenstein assumed oversight of the investigation and appointed Mr. Mueller as special counsel after the attorney general, Jeff Sessions, recused himself last year. Mr. Trump has repeatedly attacked Mr. Sessions for his recusal.

The president has previously said he is frustrated that he is not supposed to be involved with Justice Department matters.

“I am not supposed to be involved with the F.B.I. I’m not supposed to be doing the kind of things that I would love to be doing. And I’m very frustrated by it,” Mr. Trump said in an interview last November.

The president’s threats, though vague, come at a time when he has been on the defensive after the disclosure of more than 40 questions that the special counsel would like him to answer. The questions touch on a variety of topics, including coordination with the Russians during the presidential campaign and actions Mr. Trump has taken as president and whether they were intended to derail the inquiry, undercutting the president’s repeated claims that the investigation is a “hoax.”

Continue reading the main story

[ad_2]

Source link